logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.08.13 2019나9265
지분금반환 청구의 소등
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① the 3rd 11th mar of the first mar judgment "including each serial number," and ② the 5th mar 6th mar of the first mar judgment "no evidence exists" (the defendants are as follows: F, the owner of the real estate of this case, KRW 50 million; KRW 500,000,000,000, E Village Association Lee, the head of E Village Association, paid KRW 49,000,000,000 won to H, or KRW 44,50,000,000,000,000,000 won, as evidence of the first mar 1,22,44,000 won, which was paid to H and G, and most of the above mar 4,50,000,00 won, which was paid to H and H, and mar 4,504,0,00.4.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the appeal by the Defendants is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow