logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.11.19 2020나10368
소유권이전등기절차이행
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the evidence adopted in the court of first instance added the additional evidence

Therefore, this court's reasoning is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows.

2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the addition or dismissal in the judgment of the court of first instance, 3-Ga (Defendant's assertion) of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

The Plaintiff purchased the instant land from F with the knowledge that it was not entitled to sell the instant land to F at the time of the instant sales contract, and at the time of the instant sales contract, the instant land was located outside the site of the instant building, but the Plaintiff occupied the instant land without permission as the Plaintiff expanded the site of the instant building after the instant sales contract, and thus, the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land is the owner of the instant land. The Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land is the owner of the instant land. The following is added between the fourth fifth and fifth evidence of the first instance judgment of the first instance.

“At the time when the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from F, the nominal owner on the registry of the instant land was a H, other than the seller F, as seen earlier.”

3. The plaintiff's claim is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the grounds of its reasoning. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow