1.(a)

In addition, among the real estate listed in the attached list, the Plaintiff is entitled to indicate 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 14.

Facts of recognition

On September 22, 1976, the Plaintiff purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) from J on September 2, 1976, according to the title trust agreement with K and Selection E, and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the 1/2 shares in K and Selection E on October 6, 1976.

On October 5, 1987, on November 28, 1992, I, the registration of ownership transfer (the sale on March 13, 1986), Defendant C, Defendant D, and the registration of ownership transfer (the inheritance by consultation and division on November 12, 1991) of this case on the 2nd real estate of this case on the 3nd real estate of this case on the 3nd real estate of this case on the 3nd real estate of this case, and thereafter the change in ownership of each of the real estate of this case on the 4nd real estate of this case on November 23, 199, are as follows.

The instant 4 real estate was divided into the instant 3 real estate on March 8, 200 after the alteration of the right as above, and each of the instant real estate on July 9, 2007 was merged into the race L.

However, the transfer registration in the name of I among the particulars of the transfer of rights with respect to each real estate of this case is completed after I filed a lawsuit against K and Selection E to implement the transfer registration procedure and won the judgment of confession (Seoul District Court racing Support, Daegu District Court Decision 87Nu164 delivered on July 24, 1987).

The lawsuit filed against K was filed in the subsequent appeal, and the judgment of the court of first instance is null and void, and the lawsuit filed against the appointed party E was dismissed on the ground that the judgment of the court of first instance was conducted after the false delivery of the lawsuit to the service place, and that there was no evidence to deem that the first party purchased each of the instant real estate.

The Daegu District Court Decision 201Na25754 Decided January 30, 2013 (Supreme Court Decision 2011Na25754 Decided January 30, 201). On March 4, 1984, K, one of the Plaintiff’s title trustees, succeeded to Defendant B (Appointed Party), Appointed (Appointed Party), G, and H.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 20 respectively.