1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of the Japanese colonial era, E was under the circumstances of the 2nd 7th 1st g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g

B. On December 31, 1964, Defendant B, C, and D completed the registration of initial ownership relating to each one-third portion of the land before the instant subdivision, and thereafter, the land before the instant subdivision was each land listed in the separate sheet following the change of administrative district, land category, registration conversion, and subdivision (hereinafter each land was indicated by the same method as the land, and it was collectively referred to as “each of the instant land”).

C. The details of the alteration of rights on each of the instant lands are as follows.

On August 19, 1977, on March 23, 1977, the land ownership and the right to use the land, on which the ownership transfer registration of the Defendant Educational Institute of Cancheon-si was made on March 23, 1976, on March 23, 1976, on March 23, 1976, the land for which the ownership transfer registration of the Defendant Educational Institute of Cancheon-si was made on March 23, 197, and on March 23, 197, on March 23, 197, the land for which the ownership transfer registration of the Defendant Educational Institute of Cancheon-si was made on August 19, 197, on which the ownership transfer registration of the Defendant Educational Institute of Cancheon-si was made on August 19, 197, on which the ownership transfer registration of the Defendant Educational Institute of Cancheon-si was made on July 6, 1976.

D. Meanwhile, on the other hand, E died on November 25, 1956, and accordingly, G solely inherited its property, but G died on October 17, 1973, and H, I, J, Plaintiff and Defendant B jointly inherited its property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 10 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Since the Plaintiff’s assertion, E, the assistant panel of the Plaintiff, was subject to the assessment of the land before subdivision, registration of preservation of ownership in Defendant B, C, and D’s name is invalid.