1. The plaintiff's obligation to pay insurance money based on the insurance contract stated in the attached list against the defendant is 31,693,484 won and this.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an employer liability insurance contract, such as the attached Form, with the Non-Party Incorporated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party Company”), and the Defendant is the person who suffered an accident at the construction site executed by the Non-Party Company.

B. On June 16, 2009, the Defendant was trying to move sn beams and sn beams using snicks at the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu’s B site, which were performed by the non-party company in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

C. The Defendant was moving directly and directly the steel bars around the work site due to obstacles, such as electric wires around the work site.

However, the Working Group leader of the non-party company who was working at the same place was aware that the non-party company had arrived at the place of the iron located in the cler, and sent the cler a signal to the cler about the reinforcing.

Accordingly, the Defendant did not see that the Defendant was moving over the past and changed the direction of the past. However, the Defendant fell down with the river below 5 meters from the vegetable bridge at the new vegetable bridge because the direction of the past is changed.

The Defendant suffered injuries, such as slopings and saves, etc. (hereinafter “instant accidents”), by facing the saves with the saves in the save beam on the river floor.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the recognition of the liability for damages, the head of the Working Group of the non-party company confirmed the safety of the defendant who was overfinites around the steel, and subsequently neglected his duty of care to convey water signals to the clers, and operated the clers without checking the situation of the defendant who was overfinites. Accordingly, the defendant fells into the river floor and operated the clers without checking the situation of the defendant.