beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for a maximum term of one year, a short term of six months, and a defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a crytho of the 124C Maliththo.
The Defendant, around 02:40 on July 13, 2014, driven the above Oralba, and driven the five-lane road in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes from the tunnel 1, Nam-do, the two-lane roads in front of Yongsan-gu, Seoul, along the two-lanes from the tunnel 1, Namnam-do.
Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed on the front side, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and to safely drive the road and the signal well to prevent the accident in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn the signal to the left, but neglected it, and caused the victim G (the 21 year old) (the 21 year old) who was on the right side of the direction of the Otoba in violation of this rule to go beyond the floor of the victim G (the 21 year old), who was on the right side of the FK5 car driven by the victim B, entering the intersection before the vehicle signal is changed, as described in paragraph 2 of the facts charged, with the right side of the FK5 car driven by the victim B before the vehicle signal is changed.
At the same time, around July 15, 2014, around 16:38, the Defendant: (a) caused the death of the victim G by using the pre-paid part of the vehicle owned by the victim B by the aforementioned occupational negligence; (b) caused the death of the victim G by using the pre-paid part of the medical treatment at the Macheon National University Hospital located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu.
B. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of a two-wheeled automobile as stipulated in paragraph (1), operated the two-wheeled automobile without mandatory insurance on the road, at the date and time and place stated in paragraph (1).
2. Defendant B is a FK5 taxi.