1. Each of the plaintiffs' conjunctive defendants' lawsuits is dismissed.

2. The primary defendant shall list the plaintiffs in attached Form.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are constructors who concluded a subcontract agreement with the two public construction industry (hereinafter “small and Medium Company”) that is the principal contractor of the instant construction project with respect to the new construction of the building indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) (hereinafter “instant construction”) and carried out each subcontracted construction work.

The primary Defendant is the owner of the instant construction project, and the primary Defendant entered into a sales contract for the instant building with the primary Defendant on February 24, 2014 and acquired possession of the instant building, but the said sales contract was revoked, the primary Defendant is a construction company that transferred the possession of the instant building to the primary Defendant again.

B. On December 24, 2013, on the ground that the plaintiffs were not paid the construction price by the non-party company, the plaintiffs posted on the fixed door of the building of this case a notice informing the plaintiffs that the building of this case is being detained and occupied, installed a banner "in possession" on the outer wall, and installed a banner "in possession" on the outer wall, and installed a fence by using the water around the building of this case.

In addition, the suit was withdrawn on the ground that the representative company of the plaintiffs was paid the unpaid construction cost during the pending litigation of this case.

The CCTV was installed around the building of this case after concluding a contract for the use of mechanical security services with the reason that the security chain was a Co., Ltd.

C. On the other hand, the primary Defendant employed the service company employees on January 18, 2014, and removed locks installed by the Plaintiffs on the instant building, their fences, placards, etc.

On April 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a provisional injunction against the primary defendant to prohibit the transfer of possession, and the Cheongju District Court 2014Kahap655 decided the provisional injunction against the transfer of possession, but the said provisional decision was not executed on the ground that the primary defendant had been transferred possession from the primary defendant.