The plaintiff's claim against the above defendant is dismissed.

Preliminary Defendant 35,000,000 Won and its corresponding.

1. On October 4, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with the conjunctive Defendant, the main agent of the Defendant, with regard to KRW 35,00,000,000, and from September 30, 2012 to September 29, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant lease contract”). On September 17, 2012, the Plaintiff transferred the remainder of the deposit deposit to E at the request of the conjunctive Defendant, KRW 32,00,000,000,000,000, to E on October 4, 2012.

On November 2017, the Plaintiff received a request for the withdrawal from the ex officio Defendant, and notified the termination of the instant lease agreement, and then removed from the said lease.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the party principal examination results against the conjunctive defendant, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against the main defendant

A. 1) The plaintiff's assertion of granting the right of representation 1) The primary defendant granted the preliminary defendant the right to manage the building of this case to manage the building of this case, or the preliminary defendant gave the right of representation to the preliminary defendant to conclude the lease contract of this case for a long time without being aware of the fact that he had been entering into the lease contract of this case.

Therefore, the Plaintiff is obligated to return the lease deposit upon the termination of the instant lease agreement.

2) We examine whether the primary defendant granted the primary defendant the right to manage the building of this case to the primary defendant, and the result of the party personal examination against the primary defendant is insufficient to recognize it, and otherwise, the primary defendant granted the primary defendant the right to manage the building of this case to the primary defendant.

There is no evidence to prove.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3) The primary defendant explicitly expresses his intention to the conjunctive defendant.