The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had the same criminal record, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again, that the victim did not recover from damage up to the conviction, and that the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable, and therefore, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Provided, That the “Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces” in the 5th parallel and 6th parallel of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in the “former Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces (amended by Act No. 14184, May 29, 2016)” and it is obvious that the judgment of the court below is modified under Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.