logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.07.01 2016고정442
명예훼손등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On August 8, 2015, around 07:30 on August 8, 2015, the Defendant was subject to the assault from her birth D, etc. due to family problems in the domicile of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was hospitalized in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul EF Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”) on the same day, was hospitalized in the hospital in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, EF Hospital (hereinafter “instant hospital”), was performed by her medical specialist’s surgery on the left-hand aggregate, received a written diagnosis of injury, and filed a complaint against her students as a crime of assault.

In the column of ‘the need for hospitalization' of the medical certificate of injury issued by G of the State at the time, ‘the need for hospitalization' was ‘the need for hospitalization as a result of the operation,' and ‘the space of ‘the operation beyond the country' should be prepared as ‘the operation needs to be performed for the extraction,' and ‘the operation of 2015-8-10 in the form of 'the operation is carried out,' but there is no need for each ‘the number of times due to the loss of the State'.

A. On November 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the fact that the Defendant visited the above hospital to receive a new injury diagnosis issued by him/her; and (b) on October 12, 2015, after having been aware of the fact that the death diagnosis certificate was mistakenly prepared by negligence of the doctor, the Defendant visited the above hospital on November 10, 2015, and visited the patient at around 13:00, to the extent that: (a) the operation was excessive; (b) the medical expenses were dismissed due to the erroneous issuance of the medical certificate; (c) the medical expenses were refunded to him/her; (d) the total medical expenses were paid in KRW 00,000 for the purpose of receiving the injury; and (e) the three copies attached thereto, followed the A3 form, and “to refund the medical expenses to all customers who are waiting to view other medical expenses as being sound and damaged by publicly pointing out the name of the victim, the victim’s reputation, which is the public disclosure statement, by openly pointing out the fact.

2) On November 11, 2015, the Defendant, on November 11, 2015, prepared a medical certificate of injury issued erroneously in front of the same place and a pocket book with a photograph attached to the upper part of the water surface on the same day at around November 13:00, and “the sound” refers to asking excessive medical expenses.

arrow