Each of the instant public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant B: (a) around 15:00 on May 30, 2014, on the ground that the victim A (the 54-year-old age) was trying to perform the art workplace construction work and remove land boundary marks installed by the Defendant, and the victim was seated on the front floor of the indication; and (b) the victim was spawnd with the victim’s breath by breath, thereby assaulting the victim.

B. Defendant A set up against the victim B (the age of 66) at the time and place under the above paragraph (1) and abused the victim by spreading water to the victim and spathing the ebbb.

2. Each of the facts charged against the Defendants in this case is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the public trial records, each victim of the facts charged of this case can be recognized as having withdrawn his/her wishing to punish each defendant by attending the court on October 8, 2014, which was after the prosecution was instituted. Thus, each of the facts charged of this case against the defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.