1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

. Circumstances; and

A. The Plaintiff, while holding office as a public official B, retired on December 31, 2015.

The Plaintiff worked as the head of knowledge industry division from January 1, 201 to October 31, 201 of the same year and the head of finance and economy bureau from November 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015, and was employed as the head of the B Chamber of Commerce and Industry on January 11, 2016 (hereinafter “instant employment”).

B. On August 19, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to verify whether the instant employment was restricted, and the Defendant, following an examination, determined that the Plaintiff was employed by an institution closely related to the business of the department to which the Plaintiff belonged for five years before his retirement, and notified the Plaintiff on October 24, 2016 as follows.

(The part of the above notice of employment restriction and cancellation of employment (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case"). (Date of birth) name (date of birth) employment agency and position at the time of retirement, the Director-General of the Finance and Economy Bureau (**.*.**.**) B Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Employment restriction and cancellation measures - Imposition of fines for negligence at the time of retirement.

1. He/she shall notify the following matters of the review and decision of the Gyeonggi-do public service ethics committee on a request to confirm whether voluntary employees are restricted in employment pursuant to Article 33-3 (2) of the Enforcement Decree

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant asserts that the disposition of this case is legitimate, in light of the grounds for disposition and relevant statutes.

The Plaintiff asserted that the aforementioned disposition was unlawful, arguing that it was not closely related to the work performed before retirement and the work performed by the Director General of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry for the following reasons.

① At the time of the Plaintiff’s employment as the director general of the Ministry of Finance and Economy, the Plaintiff paid the budget to B chamber of commerce and industry with the Plaintiff’s approval, but the budget has already been paid before the Plaintiff’s appointment as the director general.