logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.10 2015노737
상해등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) In the judgment of the court below, Defendant 1 was aware of the victim E in the course of examining the face of the defendant without any justifiable reason, and the part of the victim’s face was in contact with the defendant’s head, and it cannot be acknowledged that the defendant intentionally did not receive the face of the above victim, and that the above victim suffered bodily injury, such as the escape of the victim, etc., due to the defendant’s above act.

B) The part of the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in the judgment of the court below regarding the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of the defendant was committed by a police officer in response thereto, and did not speak to the police officer as described in this part of the facts charged, and the abusive opinion by the defendant does not constitute "defluence" in the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of the defendant. (C) The part of the crime of interference with business against J Hospital in the 2014 Highest April 4513 of the judgment of the court below concerning J Hospital in the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of the defendant did not take a bath or sound, as described in this part of the facts charged. (d) The defendant did not take a bath by the victim first, and did not take a bath by the victim first, and did not take a bath by the victim first, and did not take a bath by the victim, and the defendant did not take a bath by the victim, regardless of his or her symptoms, he or she did not take a floor of 2014.41 p.

(f).

arrow