The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. 1) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles with respect to the fact that the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim B (Article 1(1) of the criminal facts in the original judgment) and the violence against the victim E (Article 2(2) of the criminal facts in the original judgment), there is no fact that the Defendant interfered with or assaulted E. (Article 3(3) of the criminal facts in the original judgment) concerning the injury (Article 3(3) of the criminal facts in the original judgment) on December 16, 2018. However, there is no fact that the Defendant did not assault or injure I.

3) With respect to insult (Article 4 of the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below), the Defendant did not call for a police officer L at the front of the JJ as of December 16, 2018 at the JJ around 23:25, and the Defendant did not call for a police officer to the police officer before the JJ zone. The police officer first respondeded to the defect. (4) As to interference with the duties of the victimO (Article 5 of the facts of the judgment of the court below) (Article 5 of the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below) on October 20, 2018, the Defendant did not interfere with the duties of the above main points. However, the Defendant did not interfere with the duties of the said main points.

At the time, the defendant only told the defendant's daily activities, and the customers do not leave the main place.

5) As to the act of assaulting the victim R (Article 6 of the crime in the original judgment) on November 3, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the MF5 car driven by the R from the above SM5 car on November 3, 2018. However, there is no assaulting the R.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the fraud of each of the facts charged in the instant case, and convicted all of the remainder of the facts charged.