logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.07 2013노2559
사기등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main points of the grounds for appeal are as follows: The punishment of each court below against the Defendants (the imprisonment of August, the imprisonment of Defendant A, the imprisonment of August, the imprisonment of Defendant B, and Defendant C: the imprisonment of April) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendants did not have any history of punishment for the crime related to gambling, and all of the crimes of this case were found to have been recognized and reflected, and the defendant A had a substantial damage to most victims in relation to the crime of this case and agreed with them, and is going to enter into a marriage with women's friendship, and the defendant B has to bear the burden of living expenses of all women and young children while supporting a punishment for having no ability to lead a social life due to a mental division, and the defendant B has to bear the burden of living expenses of all women and young children.

However, since the crime related to gambling, which acquires property without due labor, is detrimental to the people's sound sense of work and social morals and customs, it is necessary to punish the crime strictly. In the case of the defendant Eul, the defendant Eul leased an officetel under the name of E to avoid control, and let the defendant Gap, C, etc., who had been punished as an organized violence crime, share the role of the recruitment of players, warehouse, food appearance, etc., and operated the gambling house systematically for a considerable period of time, and operated the gambling house closely, and in the case where the gambling player is a mother and child, it is reasonable to see that the nature of the crime is very rough and bad, since the defendant Gap and C actively participated in the gambling opening crime without being aware of the period of repeated crime, and thus, the quality of the crime cannot be considered to be weak. In particular, although the defendant Gap had been sentenced to punishment in the past, he mobilized the insurance money to the majority of the general subscribers by taking advantage of the traffic accident, etc. after being mobilized.

arrow