logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 (춘천) 2018.05.09 2017누1228
국가유공자비해당결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or addition of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and the main text of Article 420 of the

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “A person who has rendered distinguished service to the State (including a person eligible for veteran’s compensation) for reasons of the chilling of the chilling of the opposite party and the chilling of the chilling of the chilling of the chilling party (hereinafter “chilling of the chilling party”)” was replaced by the following parts:

【An application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State (including persons eligible for veteran’s compensation) on the ground that he/she was suffering from chilling of retirement from the left, chilling of chilling, and chilling of climatic disorder (hereinafter “instant wounds”). The following details are added to the fourth fourth sentence of the first instance judgment.

6) On May 2, 2005, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground of the instant wound with the head of Chuncheon branch. On January 2, 2006, the head of Chuncheon branch rendered a disposition of non-existence of a person of distinguished service to the State against the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff filed an administrative litigation seeking the revocation of a non-competent decision-making disposition of a person of distinguished service to the State as the Chuncheon District Court 2006Guhap710, but withdrawn the lawsuit on December 9, 2006.

(hereinafter “Prior Case”) No. 5 of the first instance court’s 4th judgment “B 3” is converted to “B 2.” The 5th judgment of the first instance court added “the instant wound” to “the instant wound,” and “the relation with “the 5th judgment of the first instance court”. The following is added to “the 5th judgment of the first instance court,” and “the 5th judgment of the first instance court,” and “the 5th judgment of the first instance court,” and the following. Meanwhile, in the prior case, the Plaintiff was placed in the 5th judgment of the first instance court at the lowest time after the lapse of six months from the time of the military admission.

arrow