logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.28 2014고단2402
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who is one’s friendly C, entered the number system, E, which is a main agent. D, who did not receive KRW 50 million in his/her guidance from his/her own sequence, was aware of the Defendant as C and filed a complaint with the Defendant as “C” on February 2014, he/she received an investigation from an investigative agency with the Defendant’s personal information.

1. On March 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the Seoul Coast Guard Office’s Office and the Economic Team’s office, the Defendant was investigated into the instant case, such as fraud, etc., with the Defendant’s knowledge of the Defendant as C; and (b) suggested that the Defendant’s resident registration certificate for C in the name of the police officer in charge of the police station, who was requested to present his/her identification card from the police officer in charge of the above police station, was the Defendant’s resident registration certificate; (c) stated the interrogation protocol as C, stating it as “C” in the interrogation protocol; and (d) sent the police officer

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents and forged C's signature, and exercised C's signature.

2. On July 16, 2014, the Defendant presented C’s resident registration certificate as stated in paragraph (1) to a police officer in charge of the above police station, who was requested to produce identification cards from a police officer in charge of the police station, after completing the investigation, after entering “C” in the suspect interrogation protocol, sent the same to the police officer in charge.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use official documents and forged C's signature, and exercised C's signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to the defendant (C)

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 230 (Unlawful Exercise of Official Documents and Selection of Imprisonment) of the Criminal Act, Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime.

arrow