logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.04.28 2014나20934
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. From February 6, 2004, the Labor Standards Act provides that “The employer shall immediately issue a certificate concerning the period of use, business type, status, wages, and other necessary matters, even after the retirement of the worker, to the present day from February 6, 2004, on condition that the said certificate must include only the matters requested by the worker.”

In around 205, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant Company to issue the Plaintiff’s certificate of career for reemployment, and the certificate of career issued by the Defendant Company stated “B B, Jul. 23, 2003.” The Defendant Company requested deletion of the above contents on several occasions by not later than 2013, such as requesting the Defendant Company’s personnel management office to delete the above contents, but the Defendant Company revised the above contents on Apr. 5, 2013. The Plaintiff was unable to be re-employed from around 2005 to around 2013. The Plaintiff was liable to compensate the Plaintiff for mental damage caused by the Plaintiff’s failure in re-employment as above. According to the phrase “A, 2, 4, and 5,” the Plaintiff’s certificate of career to the effect that “Defendant Company B, on March 1, 2092, entered the Plaintiff’s office on July 3, 200 and the Plaintiff’s retirement on July 28, 2014.”

However, evidence Nos. 12, 13-1, 2, 14, 16, and 21-1, 2, and 24.

arrow