1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 22, 2013, the Plaintiff entered and worked as B at Defendant Korea Standards Bank (hereinafter “Defendant Bank”) and according to the statement in the certificate of evidence No. 1 of the voluntary retirement Gap on December 15, 2016, the Plaintiff’s career certificate is indicated as “special retirement”.

B.

On May 12, 2017, after the plaintiff retired, the defendant bank announced the plaintiff on May 12, 2017 that "where the domestic bank of tranj Bank commission opened an account at a foreign exchange settlement office, such as scam dyke Bank, in order for the plaintiff to settle the account in foreign exchange currency with the foreign bank, the defendant bank collected the above account at the request of the domestic bank. Around September 2016, the defendant bank increased the fees for managing and treating the above account. Around 2016, the defendant bank notified the plaintiff of the resolution of the personnel committee for disciplinary action (the committee for disciplinary action) by resolving the civil petition in the way that the Korean bank, which is the customer bank, raised the fees and collected excessive fees without complying with the procedures for treating the defendant bank's civil petition, without complying with the procedures for returning the civil petition to the bank in Korea, which violated the rules of conduct, customer civil petition treatment regulations, etc., and notified the defendant bank of the disciplinary action (the disciplinary action)."

(hereinafter “instant salary reduction disposition”). C.

On May 23, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for review on the instant salary reduction disposition with the Defendant Bank. However, on June 12, 2017, the Defendant Bank notified the Plaintiff of a review decision to maintain the instant salary reduction disposition (Resolution of the Personnel Committee on June 7, 2017).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the main defense of this case

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties disregards all the regulations or procedures of the Defendant Bank.