(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고정1746

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고정1746

주거침입

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the buyer of Seo-gu Daejeon, and the victim D is the seller of the above C Borrowing.

On July 11, 2013, at around 09:00, the Defendant, with knowledge of the existence of no heading 401, the victim was killed, and had a waterproof construction business operator carry out a waterproof construction work on the rooftop, and had him/her carry out a waterproof construction work on the rooftop, and had the construction business operator intrudes on the 303 bend floor from the rooftop to the 303nd floor where the victim died.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion against the defendant and his defense counsel knew that the defendant had to continue the work since the defendant had been engaged in rooftop construction before the time of this case with the consent of the victim, and the waterproof Corporation asserts to the effect that the defendant's constructive consent of the victim was obtained or that it was a legitimate act that does not go against the social rules, since it was inevitable to prepare for the summer season and it was caused by the crime of this case.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, namely, the victim appears to have permitted the victim to have access to his residence so that the defendant could be allowed to work in the toilet prior to the date of the crime in this case, and thereafter, the defendant called the victim's house with the victim as a result of the conflict between the victim and the victim, and the victim appears to not have access to the waterproof Construction Work on August 5, 2013, which was first agreed upon by the victim, and the victim could not have access to the waterproof Construction Work without obtaining the consent or consent of the victim on the day of the crime in this case. The defendant, on the above grounds, cancelled the password No. 401 and enters the above CBL No. 401 and 303 without obtaining the consent or consent of the victim on the day of the crime in this case.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.05.09 2012고정632

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2013.05.01 2013고단571

-서울서부지방법원 2015.06.26 2014고정1569

-서울북부지방법원 2013.04.24 2013노238

-대전지방법원 2013.02.22 2012고정2514