A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Although anyone of the 2016 Highest 1874 was prohibited from taking in, inhaleing, or possessing for this purpose any chemical substance that causes interest, hallucation, or anesthesia and that is prescribed by Presidential Decree, the Defendant inhaled, in the back of the "D" located in Sacc on July 2, 2016.

No person of "2016 Highest 1910" shall take in or inhale hallucinogenic substances which cause entertainment, hallucination, or anesthesia, or possess them for such purposes.

In such a situation, the Defendant around December 1, 2016, around 21:00, and the same month.

2. Around 21:00, F in the city E two times, placed a dynas containing luene, which is a hallucinogenic substance, into an empty hynasium A, and inhales it in a way that the hynasium A, with a hynasium A.

Accordingly, the defendant inhaled hallucinogenic substances that cause entertainment, hallucination, or anesthesia.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1874"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A seizure record and a seizure list;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Photographs "2016 Highest 1874";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Chemicals Control Act and Article 22 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime and the selection of punishment, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act - Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act - The fact that there are many favorable criminal records, the fact that there are many other criminal records of the same kind, but it has been ten years ago, and the fact that they are deemed to have lived faithfully

(k) Unfavorable normal: A person who has been sentenced to a second offense while being investigated more than one time, and has been sentenced to several times for a crime of the same kind for the past ten years;

- The age, sex, environment, and crime of the defendant.