A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2018, at the C parking lot located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 11:45, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports and solicited the Defendant to return home to be provided with guidance on the procedures for compensation for damages from the border E belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station D District District, Seoul, the Seoul District Police Agency D, which called for 112; (b) provided that the Defendant continued to answer her home, she is not aware of administrative laws; (c) provided that she would go back to her home; and (d) interfered with the circumstances F that she would go against the Defendant, she would go back to her back to the right breast by her hand.

The Defendant continued to get on and return a patrol boat E, and attempted to get on and get on the patrol boat back by getting on and getting on the patrol boat knife, and failed to get on the patrol boat E to get on the patrol boat, get on the patrol boat E, to get on the patrol boat, and not get off the patrol boat at the request of the police officer, thereby interfering with the operation of the patrol boat.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to the statement of a shote);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act: The use of violence by the defendant against the police officers in uniform shall not be deemed to be minor;

It seems that the crime of this case not only damaged public power, but also affected the morale of police officers.

A favorable normal condition: The defendant recognizes a mistake and reflects it, and there is no history of criminal punishment.

The degree of violence in use is not significantly serious.

As above, the defendant's unexpected circumstances are the same.