logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.10.14 2020고단2052
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an operator of the “C” entertainment tavern in the Mai-si B and the 5th floor.

On August 4, 2019, the Defendant provided alcoholic beverages to the name-free customers who visited the said entertainment drinking house and provided entertainment with a license for entertainment along with a female entertainment restaurant supplied through a tentatively named “news”, and received entertainment expenses including 180,000 won from the said customers and received entertainment expenses, including 1.80,000 won for sexual traffic, around 05:18 on the same day, provided that the Defendant had the said customer and female entertainment loan be sent to D at a broad time and had them have a sexual relationship once from that time.

9. From the date of May, 15, sexual traffic has been arranged for business operations over a total of 50 times, such as in the annexed list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement, the defendant F of each suspect interrogation protocol of the prosecution about E, and the statement of the police about H of each police interrogation protocol of the police about G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records, seizure lists D business account books, and copies of daily account books;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. additionally collected under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the defendant's mistake in sentencing is recognized, the period of business and the size of profits, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, method, and result of the crime shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions.

arrow