A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the proprietor of the “C” entertainment drinking house in the luminous B and the 2nd floor.

On August 1, 2019, the Defendant provided alcoholic beverages to the above entertainment drinking house, and provided entertainment with a female entertainment loan provided through the so-called “news entertainment”, and received entertainment expenses including 180,000 won for commercial sex acts from the above guest, and had the above guest and the above female entertainment loan sent to the above female guest with a sexual intercourse one time at the same time on the same day, around 23:17 on the same day.

In addition, from the above date to September 22, 2019, the Defendant, as described in the list of crimes, provided that the Defendant had sexual intercourses between the female contact loan and the above “Del”, which was provided through the “marcing” by receiving sexual traffic prices from customers with no name at least eight times in total, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the suspect interrogation protocol E to the defendant's court statement, each police interrogation protocol of the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant F to the defendant, the investigation report of the suspect interrogation protocol of the police about F (the analysis of business books discovered

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. additionally collected under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the defendant's mistake in sentencing is recognized, the period of business and the size of profits, the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, method, and result of the crime shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions.