Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a personal business owner who received a lump sum subcontract from C for the “E” work located in Gyeyang-gu, Yangyang-gu.

The results of the occasional supervision conducted on May 14, 2012 (the sites of defective safety management or small or medium construction sites);

1. Where a business owner constructs a bridge, passage, etc., he/she shall use a solid structure, and take measures to prevent the sloping or extinguishing of a bridge;

(Article 24(1) of the Rules on the Standards for Industrial Safety and Health. Nevertheless, the Defendant used a wooden bridge that is not a solid structure in the field and does not have a slick prevention measure.

2. The business owner shall install safety risks in the aspect of the open stairs the height of which is not less than 1 meter;

(Article 30 of the Rules on the Industrial Safety and Health Standards). Nevertheless, the Defendant did not install a safe distance on the open side of the first floor stairs in that field.

3. In case where the business owner engages in the work by assembling the mobile vision, he shall install the safety gap at the highest part of the nonmeter; and

(Article 38 subparag. 3 of the Rules on the Standards for Industrial Safety and Health). Nevertheless, despite the fact that the Defendant works in a mobile-type vision in the field, the Defendant did not install a safe distance at the highest part of the non-level community.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the fourth trial record;

1. According to the construction safety and health supervision table, corrective instruction, each field safety management order, and each evidence of each of the above photographs, although the field agent of this case stated F as the person in charge of the construction site of this case, it is merely merely a formal name, and G stated that he/she tried to work as a field agent on his/her behalf in this court, but G did not have a certificate of qualification related thereto.