logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 06. 29. 선고 2017두39044 판결
(심리불속행) 명의신탁에 있어 조세회피와 상관없는 뚜렷한 목적과, 당시에나 장래에 회피될 조세가 없다는 점을 입증하여야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court 2016Nu22438 ( February 10, 2017)

Title

(In the case of a title trust, it must prove that the title trust has a clear purpose of tax avoidance and that there is no tax to be avoided at that time or in the future.

Summary

(Main) The Plaintiff alleged that it was stolen from the name of the Plaintiff, but it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff was committed as a unilateral act, such as the external auditor, and it is difficult to view that the change of ownership was made for a clear other purpose that is not related to the purpose of tax avoidance, or that there was no tax to be avoided at the time of transfer of ownership or in the future.

Related statutes

Donation of title trust under Article 45-2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2017Du39044 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Gift Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2016Nu22438 Decided October 10, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Special Act on the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow