Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the claimant for observation order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal is limited to the defendant and the requester of the protective order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant").

The reason for appeal submitted by the defendant is also stated as the reason for appeal, but the defendant and his defense counsel have explicitly withdrawn the argument of mental disorder on the first trial date.

사실 오인 및 법리 오해( 특수 상해의 점) 피고인이 피해자를 손으로 폭행하거나 손가락을 꺽은 사실은 인정하지만, 나무 막대기로 때리고 과도로 허벅지를 찌른 사실은 없다.

Specifically, in the case of the wooden part, it is difficult to believe the victim's statement that the wooden machine was not submitted as evidence, and it is difficult to view the wooden part as being caused only when the wooden machine was made. The victim's statement is difficult to believe, it does not constitute a dangerous object as the dead cost used for the wire in the wooden machine section, and it is not a wooden machine that the victim suffered from the side, such as the wooden machine, etc., can occur in his daily life, and it is limited to the natural therapy, and it does not constitute an injury under the Criminal Act.

또 한 과도 부분의 경우, 과도에 허벅지를 찔렸다는 피해자의 진술은 추측에 불과 한 점, 피해자가 피고 인과의 실랑이 도중 바닥에 있던 도자기 파편에 허벅지를 찔렸을 가능성도 있는 점, 이 사건 과도는 끝이 뭉툭 하여 피해자의 청바지를 뚫고 상해를 입히기 어렵고 피해자를 치료한 의사도 피해자의 상처가 칼에 의한 것인지 알 수 없다는 소견을 밝힌 점, 피고인이 곧바로 피해자의 바지를 벗기고 상처를 치료하려고 하였는바, 이는 상해를 가한 사람의 태도로 보기 어려운 점 등에 비추어 보면 과도로 허벅지를 찔렸다는 피해자의 진술은 믿기 어렵다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous and legal.