1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs who are ordered to pay additional amounts below.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant C driven a D taxi on November 26, 2014, around 21:30, and stopped on the crosswalk after passing through a stop line for the signal waiting at the scam of Gwangju, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, while driving to the Yangdong market. 2) At that time, the network E (hereinafter “the network”) was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, thereby obstructing the operation of the said taxi while blocking the above taxi while driving along the above crosswalk, and the passenger and the horse conflict with the passengers aboard the said taxi, and Defendant C got off the body of the deceased from the above taxi.

3) Defendant C driven the said taxi and left the said intersection without cutting the Deceased at night without moving it to a safe place, even though the Deceased exceeded the above crosswalk. 4) After Defendant C left the said intersection, Defendant C driven G-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”) and passed the said intersection to the left-hand turn at the seat of the Gwangju MBC broadcasting station, the Deceased, who was used in the said crosswalk, was on the left-hand turn.

(5) On November 27, 2014, the Deceased died of brain damage at the Joseon University Hospital on November 27, 2014 (hereinafter “instant accident”). A, the heir of the Deceased, who is the wife, and the Plaintiff B, who is his father, are married.

7) Defendant Association of Private Passenger Taxi Transportation Business (hereinafter “Defendant Association”)

The insurer is the insurer which has entered into a mutual aid agreement for the instant taxi. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 7 and 8 (which has a serial number) are included; hereinafter the same shall apply).

3.3 5 1.3 1.3 1.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the accident location of this case is likely to occur by the vehicle only when a person is used on the road at night as a road in which the vehicle frequently flows. Thus, the defendant C, as the defendant, assaults the deceased, and assault it on the crosswalk.