logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.10.17 2014고합280
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강요행위등)등
Text

Of the facts charged in this case, it is not guilty of violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

Reasons

The acquittal portion

1. On February 9, 2014, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Nowon-gu, Seoul, Nowon-gu, 106 dong 1206 dong 1206, connected with “F” fluorcing fluorcing with a smartphone for the purpose of searching for sexual traffic, and opened a Kakao fluorcing room with the victim and the victim, who had fluorcing with the victim on the condition of sexual traffic by visiting the page of “Athropic” opened by the victim G (n.e., the age 13).

The Defendant connected the victim’s “Kakakaoto” photograph through the victim’s “Kakaogle” photograph, and stored comments on the victim’s “Kakaoto” photograph on the victim’s “Kakaoto” phone number book, and added them to the victim’s “Kakaotox” list.

The Defendant agreed to act of similarity with the victim by designating 320,000 won during 3 hours of sexual traffic between the victim and the victim during the conversation “Kakakaox,” and sent the victim the victim’s chest photograph by stating, “I am by affixing the fry photograph to see her chest.”

Although the Defendant demanded the victim to engage in sexual traffic in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu where the victim himself resides, the victim himself does not have to go too far from Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, which makes it impossible for the victim to engage in sexual traffic, the defect that the victim himself or herself cannot engage in sexual traffic, the defect that the victim himself or herself does not have to go far from Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu, and the victim's transmission of the photograph by cutting down his or her Kakaostostostos to the victim-friendly group.

arrow