logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.03.16 2020고단2513
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million by the Cheongju District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in B SP owned by himself/herself for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (not after an accident).

On November 20, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on November 20, 2020:0:55, and continued to proceed the way in front of the Heak-gu C at the Cheongju-si Eccoon.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the former and the latter and accurately operating the operation and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected the part on the right side of the passenger car in the Switzerland, which is the victim F owned by the victim F, who was parked on the right side of the proceeding, was shocked into the front part of the vehicle in the Switzerland and the rear light part, and caused the Austria to transfer it to the road.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the above 1,175,00 won for repair, and immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures.

2. On November 20, 2020, the Defendant, after causing a traffic accident as stated in the preceding paragraph at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, driven under the influence of alcohol, such as being arrested by K on the front side of “I cafeteria” located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, who was called up on November 20, 2020 and was called up on November 20, 200 and called up on November 25, 200, while flying.

Even though there are reasonable grounds to recognize it, the police officer was requested to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by putting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument one-hour from the above circumstances, and did not comply with the police officer's request for the measurement of drinking alcohol without justifiable grounds.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

arrow