logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.07.23 2018고단1723
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 12, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and ten months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Cheongju District Court for the crime of attempted rape, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Cheongju Prison on October 9, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

"2018 Highest 1723"

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the B SP area.

On May 16, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car at around 03:30, the Defendant driven the said car, leading the front road of the Public Procurement Service, which is located in 108, the Heung-gu, Goi-gu, Goi-si, Goi-si, to the right side of the terminal shooting distance from the right side of the two-lanes.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side and the left side, and to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving a road at the right side of the road while under the influence of alcohol, and went away without immediately stopping the road boundary seat, which is installed on the right side of the road, with the front wheels of the said vehicle, and driving the said vehicle onto the road, and destroying the road boundary seat on the road, without taking necessary measures.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) provides that the Defendant shall leave the scene of an accident while driving a motor vehicle in a drunken while drinking alcohol, and after receiving a report, arrested a police official belonging to the Cheongju-gu Police Station in charge of the Cheongju-gu Police Station who called out after receiving the accident as mentioned in the above paragraph (1). On the same day, around 03:53 of the same day, the Defendant was requested to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting the vehicle in a breath under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant under the influence of alcohol and under the influence of alcohol, for about 14 minutes from the same day even until 04:07 of the same day.

arrow