logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.18 2015고단4275
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for five months, for one year, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 9, 2013, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 9, 2013 at the Seoul Eastdong District Court. Defendant C is under suspension of execution after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment for obstruction of performance of official duties on April 18, 2014 by the Seoul Southern District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants’ role and the public offering-related Defendants B and H are those who advertise credit business and offer money to those who need money to make an advertisement report and contact with them.

Defendant

C At the direction of Defendant B, the person who arranged the sale of the passbook, and withdraws the source of damage deposited in the passbook. Co-Defendant B prior to separation was promised by Defendant B, the person who opened the account and transferred the passbook and cash card, and withdraws the source of damage deposited in his account. Defendant A withdraws the source of damage deposited in the passbook under H’s direction.

Defendant

B and H reported on the Internet website that a borrower who intends to sell a used vehicle and a vehicle will buy a used vehicle, made a false statement that the borrower would buy a vehicle as if he/she were with a telephone, and made a false statement that he/she would sell the vehicle to the borrower as if he/she was the borrower, so that the borrower would buy the vehicle, and made it possible for the borrower to enter into a motor vehicle sales contract. After receiving the transfer of the used vehicle sales amount to the agricultural bank account of Defendant I, in which Defendant B was aware of, and if the damaged amount was remitted, the Defendant C, I, and Defendant A conspired to do so in order to do so by withdrawing it.

2. Central Triang Fraud Defendant B and H are as follows: “K” on October 6, 2014 on the Internet site “K” in KRW 26 million.

arrow