logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.11 2017고단595
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in DES900.

On December 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car on December 17:10, 2016, and led to the four-lane road in front of the “Fwa Holdings” in Gyeonggi-ri City, along with three-lanes from the sloping of the intersection to the bridge.

Since there is a private street intersection with a signal apparatus, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to see the breath and the left and right of the driver, to accurately operate the steering and brakes, and to safely drive the steering in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and took part of the part behind the Plaintiff’s Hast Systa car driven by G (46 S) in the front part of the said E Q900 vehicle, which was driven by G (46 S) in the front part of the said E Q900 vehicle, and received part of the victim I (e.g., the victim I (e., the 29 years old) who turns left to the left in accordance with the new subparagraph due to the negligence that continued to proceed with the red signals. The part of the front part of the Ji30 vehicle driven by the Ji30 vehicle was the front part of the said E Q90 vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, destroyed the said rocketing car owned by the said victim G, to the extent of KRW 304,464 at repair cost, followed by the said victim I suffered injury, such as salt ties and tensions, which require approximately three weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, 2,143,278 won of repair cost did not take necessary measures such as destroying the said 130 vehicle to the extent that the said 130 vehicle was destroyed, and the said 2,143,278 won escaped without any necessary measures, such as aiding the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, I, and K;

1. A traffic accident inspection report, the scene of the accident, and photographs of the accident vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after the injury from duty) as to the crime, Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow