Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness at the Busan District Court No. 351, the Busan District Court No. 351, which was located at the Busan District Court, around 16:0, 2016, and 3393, which was located at the Busan District Court.

The defendant, upon C and D's request, has prepared and submitted a letter of joining the Cheongman consumer living cooperative. However, there was no fact that the defendant attended the promoters' meeting or the general meeting of the above cooperative, and the contact point of D was stored in his/her cell phone, and he/she had conversationsd with D before attending the court as a witness.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s “not later than now before entering the court” by the Prosecutor (C or D).

I cannot answer the question "..."

It is necessary to answer "," and to talk about how to contact D's contact point.

I may know at present the contact point of the question "I am well."

The answer is that “I cannot say that the opinion that now is certain is not stored in the cell phone of the witness,” and the contact point of D is not stored.

The witness answers "..." to the question of "....", and the witness "at the meeting of the promoters of the partnership or a general meeting after the letter of consent to the membership of the association was prepared."

The question " shall be examined at all once on the first day of the subscription, whether two times or not, and thereafter."

The answer, “I think how the present term is replaced by the counsel? I think about how it would be replaced by the counsel? I think this consent is written, the general assembly also made two times, and the money is not the same as it was made through D.

The answer to the question “..” and made a false statement contrary to memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Recording notes, Busan District Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 3393 Decided 3393, each protocol of public trial, protocol of examination of witness, and written oath;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (timely 5);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;