The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is not a perjury since the defendant had no call from E by a police officer around 11:45 on December 13, 2008, as stated in the judgment of the court below, since he had no call from E by a police officer on December 13, 208.

Even if the defendant testified without memory of a monetary fact with a police officer, there was no intention of perjury.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The judgment of the court below is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below, i.e., ① F was investigated as a witness of the case of occupational embezzlement, etc. against C at the Full Police Station on December 12, 2008 (hereinafter “the case”). At this time, F made a statement as the accused as the informant of the case. Thus, on December 13, 2008, the investigator in charge of the case at the time when F was investigated, there was a reason to ask the accused who was the informant of the case at the time. ② E slope was called from F with the Defendant’s cell phone on December 13, 2008, and was made with the Defendant’s cell phone on December 14, 2008, and prepared an investigation report related to the case of 3rd, 100, 200, 30,0000, 10,000, 10,000, 200, 3.