A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant pays 45,046,00 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

3.2

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “(2013 Highest 142)”, is the site director of the “E New Construction” located in Asan-si, Asan-si, which was executed by the “(State) Industries Development”, used the “F” operated by the Victim C to receive the parts of the said construction site, and used them to obtain money from the victim.

Around September 1, 2011, the Defendant displayed the worker list stating that “at the site, 13 additional lighting records have been used,” and the victim made a false statement stating that “I would like to receive and pay the personnel expenses of the pre-existing group, other than the pre-existing group working at the site, from the headquarters every day, of the pre-existing group at the headquarters. I would like to have the worker list paid instead of the pre-existing group personnel expenses indicated in the worker list, by November 5, 201, reported to the head office at the State headquarters, and would have the worker list paid by November 5, 201.”

However, in fact, the above worker list was written voluntarily by the defendant, and the defendant did not have employed the above additional worker list and had the above additional worker list work.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,404,00 from the victim to the bank account in the name of G around September 1, 2011.

In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 45,046,00 from the victim over 37 occasions as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table from October 28, 2011.

around 01:20 on January 20, 2013, the Defendant, “2013 Man-Ma208,” which was operated by the Defendant and a person related to the Defendant and the her related to the victim I (the Defendant, 46 years of age) on the H-1 floor of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, stated that “The Defendant’s question whether the victim would have caused the other her flag to the other flag and the wind” that “the flag was not caused by the flag’s flag was not caused by the flag’s flag, and is not a special relation to the flag’s flag’s flag’s b