logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 09. 08. 선고 2011두10256 판결
(심리불속행) 골프장 내 원형보전임야에 대한 종합부동산세 과세는 위헌법률에 해당하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu31722 (Law No. 13, 2011)

Title

The imposition of comprehensive real estate holding tax on forest land preserved in its original form within the golf course does not constitute an unconstitutional law.

Summary

(C) The land subject to special aggregate taxation and the forest land for a membership golf course shall not be deemed to be discriminated against without any reasonable grounds, on the ground that the forest land for a membership golf course is not specified as the land subject to special aggregate taxation.

Cases

201Du10256(Partial revocation) of comprehensive real estate holding tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAAAA Company

Defendant-Appellee

port of origin

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2010Nu31722 Decided April 13, 2011

Imposition of Judgment

September 8, 2011

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

arrow