logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.05.31 2017고단50
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 21, 2008, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Busan District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on November 12, 2008, a summary order of KRW 4 million was issued in the same court as the same crime.

Although Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving regulations on two occasions, Defendant 1 driven a dyna-type car in the state of under the influence of alcohol content 0.160% in blood while under the influence of alcohol content 0.160% on December 28, 2016, at the time from the 00:20 Syna-dong, Syna-dong, Syna-dong, Syna-dong, Syna-si, Syna-si, Syna-si, Syna-si.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle D in driving another motor vehicle.

On December 28, 2016, around 00:20, the Defendant proceeded along a three-lane road in C, one-lane from a one-way wind discharge to a new three-lane.

At the time, since it is night and a place where a signal is installed, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to drive motor vehicles safely in accordance with good faith by accurately operating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, it is unclear that the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol content 0.160% while driving in the same direction as the Defendant by negligence while driving in a state where normal driving is impossible, such as a rain distance for walking, and the Defendant was parked in the same direction as the Defendant, and the victim E (24 years) who was parked in the first lane pursuant to the new subparagraph. The latter part of the FST5 vehicle driven by the victim E (24 years) was called the front part of the said FM5 vehicle, and the above SM5 passenger vehicle was pushed into the front part of the said FM5 vehicle and waiting for the signal in the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc., requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

arrow