A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking), and on May 23, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of three million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking), and on the support of the source method of drinking in Ansan, and on May 23, 2008, a fine of three million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in drinking) at least twice.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On January 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.109% in blood, and driven it at a 4081-dong in the event of athletic string, while driving it at a 0.109%, and Jeju would drive it at an insular speed from the right side of the entrance of a scenic apartment to the right side of the road towards the right side of the Pung apartment at an insular speed.

At the time, the signal was installed at night, so there was a duty of care to reduce the speed and thoroughly operate the steering system and brakes thoroughly, thereby preventing accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in proceeding without reducing speed and driving at the same time, and the part of the Defendant’s vehicle behind the left side of the vehicle for the EM5 riding of the victim D (hereinafter referred to as EM5) who was waiting in the signal at one-lane, followed by the Defendant’s vehicle’s vehicle’s left side, led to the impact that the said SM5 passenger vehicle was pushed ahead of the right side of the vehicle, and the said SM5 passenger vehicle was pushed ahead of the Gyst or the left side of the F driver’s Gstst or the vehicle, which was stopped at the two-lanes of the above SM5 passenger vehicle, led to the pan part behind the right side of the vehicle for the above SM5 passenger.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, such as franchis, which requires two weeks of treatment, and the injury to the victim H (V, 47 years of age) who was on board Franchisa car, which requires two weeks of treatment.

2...