1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,549,337 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from May 3, 2012 to September 15, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On May 3, 2012, the Defendant was called to the reserve forces on May 3, 2012, and the freight truck is E in the D unit located in Chungcheong City C (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”).

) While receiving education to drive the instant vehicle, the Plaintiff was shocked with the part on the right-hand side of the instant vehicle during the course of the vehicle’s right-handing after departing from the instant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff was performing a assistant duty to guide and control the mobilized reserve forces, which had received training on driving vehicles at the time of the instant accident. However, the Plaintiff was under inspection on the front part of the instant accident vehicle as the Plaintiff did not shut down the seat door before the departure of the vehicle on board.

3) Due to the instant death, the Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as the upper left-hand pellleys, the pellet, and the left-hand pelkes, etc.; however, the Plaintiff received fixed liquors using approximately two 3 cms on the upper-hand pelkes (3 cm). The Plaintiff’s personal information was as follows.

Gender: The date of the occurrence of a F-related accident on May 3, 2012: the fact that there is no dispute over the remaining age of 19 years and 6 months (applicable to recognition), Gap's entries in the evidence of 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the occurrence of the liability for damages and the recognition of the above restriction, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the instant accident as the driver of the vehicle involved in the instant accident.

However, the defendant's liability is limited to 80% in consideration of the details and contents of the accident in this case.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of lost income and the Plaintiff’s assertion 1, due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff received fixed liquors on the left-side framework part of the instant case, and needed an operation to remove the relevant balles in the future. Around three weeks period is required to return to daily life after the removal of balles. As such, the Defendant is equivalent to the Plaintiff’s lost income for the said three weeks period.