A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Larceny;

A. On July 22, 2015, around 10:00 to 12:31, the Defendant: (a) stolen the market price placed in the front of the carcter located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with one cellular phone unit (G) and three physical cards located in the cellular phone unit (G) owned by the victim E, the market price of which is unknown; and (b) thefted with three physical cards located in the cell phone unit (G).

B. On July 23, 2015, around 13:06, at the H convenience store operated by the victim G in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, the Defendant stolen the victim with a method of inserting the victim’s cresh equivalent to KRW 1,300 in the market price under his/her management, in which the victim’s supervision was neglected.

2. On July 22, 2015, at the H convenience point operated by the victim G in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 10:31, 2015, the Defendant purchased one cigarette equivalent to KRW 4,500, from the H convenience point operated by the victim G in Guro-gu, Seoul, and used a stolen e-mail card (credit card) by presenting the victim’s new e-mail card (credit card number: I) that was stolen as one’s normal card and settling it as if it were one’s own normal card. The Defendant obtained one cigarette from the victim’s seat from the victim, i.e., by fraud, from the above date to 12:18 of the same day, acquired goods of KRW 54,900 in total by the above method, and used the stolen e-mail card (credit card).

3. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud, around 12:31, 2015, purchased a clock in the K-K cafeteria operated by the victim who is not aware of the name in the Seoul Guro-gu Seoul High Court, and attempted to obtain a stolen E’s new clock card (credit number: L) as stated in paragraph 1(a), from the victim’s normal card, by using the clock as if the victim was his/her own normal card, and, i.e., to obtain the clock from the victim and obtain the clock from the victim, the Defendant refused the approval for use

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The defendant;