A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 26, 2017, the Defendant found 1 DNA cards (credit card number: E) lost by the victim C on the street of the building B in front of the Chungcheongju City, on June 26, 2017.

The Defendant, without going through necessary procedures such as returning the credit card acquired as above, embezzled the credit card as he had, without going through necessary procedures.

2. Violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. On June 27, 2017, around 01:28, the Defendant purchased one tobacco equivalent to the market value of KRW 4,800 at “G convenience store” located in Chungcheong City F, and paid the purchase price by presenting C’s credit card, as in the foregoing paragraph 1, as if it were one’s card.

B. On June 27, 2017, at around 03:29, the Defendant purchased alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 100,000 at the market price from “Imina” in “Imina”, and paid the purchase price by presenting C’s credit card as if it was one’s card.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (verification of CCTV data in card-using places);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of embezzlement of stolen articles), Article 70(1)3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act (the point of use of lost credit cards, inclusive) and the choice of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (within the scope of adding up the maximum amount of the crimes above two crimes prescribed for a violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act which has heavier penalty)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the provisional payment order is relatively small, and the amount that the victim has settled by credit card as indicated in the judgment is the same as the order shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the victim