1. The Defendant’s KRW 257,205,300 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 20% per annum from November 30, 2013 to June 30, 2015.

Based on the facts, the plaintiff in the relationship between the parties concerned is a person who produces gold-type products for automobile use using gold-type products completed through gold-type manufacturers, such as the plaintiff, and supplies them to Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "on-site motor vehicles") or Hyundai Mos Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "on-site motor vehicles").

The Plaintiff’s production and supply of gold-types against the Defendant refers to the Plaintiff’s submission of a quotation and cost account statement, etc. to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s production and supply of gold-types to the Plaintiff, after requesting the Plaintiff to develop the gold-types, are made in such a way that the Plaintiff produces and supplies gold-types to the Plaintiff.

QZ C-PAD LHD Left Dole Dr, driving cost means a vehicle located on the left part.

around July 2012, the Defendant: (a) conducted a competitive bidding to select an enterprise that is entrusted with the manufacture of plastic-type QZ C-PAD LHD LHD 47 (hereinafter referred to as “gold-type 1”); (b) the Plaintiff participated in the said competitive bidding at KRW 2,284,084,277 in total, the Plaintiff selected the Plaintiff as an eligible enterprise on July 24, 2012 and requested the development of gold-type. On July 24, 2012, the Defendant entered the “HMC Hyundai Motor Vehicle” in the “Determination Standard (Post Consultation)” and the special article column as “The payment of the price is us, and HaEGO is us, and HKMC Hyundai Motor in preparation for recovery.”

On August 10, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 2,100,000,000 to the market price of the gold type No. 1 (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the content that “The price of the gold type No. 1” was written, and on the bottom of the said agreement, the content of the circumstances: