logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.07.04 2013고합590
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(공갈)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the representative director of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”), who is a manufacturer of automobile parts located in the Daegu-gu H, in operating the company. From around 1998, the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of automobile parts with the victim J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) from around 1998, and used approximately 360 punishments, which are owned by the victim company, and supplied them with approximately KRW 32 billion per annual average of 2 billion to the victim company.

"2013 Gohap590"

1. From among the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes) the Defendant, at around 21:00 on June 25, 2013, he/she was found to have produced one day’s production at the GI-out shop located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and one-day production at the GI-out shop among the gold-type essential for the production of motor vehicle launch parts, and stored its parts, and accordingly, he/she was found to have removed each lower portion of the three gold-types owned by the victim company, which require continuous supply of parts, from I-out x off off, and removed each lower portion of the three gold-types from I-out x off, and then removed from I-out x-type, such as the I-out x-type, A-out x-type, A-out x-type, A-type, A-out x-type, and five-year x-type, 1,000.

On June 26, 2013, 06:49, the following day, the Defendant, at around five e-mail (e-mail), including the head of the headquarters for the management support of the victim company and the president of the M-mail of the victim company, notified the victim company of the interruption of the unilateral transaction, e-mail, and e-mail. On the same day, the Defendant’s call to the N-head of the victim company at around 20:00 on the same day.

arrow