A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On October 25, 2010, the Defendant paid 400,000 won at the entrance of the E hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and purchased camphones with approximately 0.3g of psychotropic drugs, which are psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection device, from F (hereinafter “camphones”).

2. On November 201, 2010, the Defendant, at the roof tower located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on a first-come 20:00, injected approximately 0.1g of a philophone, which is one-time medication, from among the philophones purchased as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, into beer, and injected it by dilution with beer.

3. On November 201, 2010, the Defendant, at the end of 21:00, injected approximately 0.1g of the philophones purchased at the above-mentioned rooftop room, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, into beer, with a dilution of approximately 0.1g of the philophones, into beer, and administered them.

4. On January 22, 201, the Defendant, at the lower end 22:00, injected approximately 0.1g of a one-time popon, purchased from the above-mentioned rooftop room, as described in the foregoing paragraph 1, into beer, after dilution with the beer.

5. On July 2012, the Defendant: (a) paid 500,000,000 won to a person in secret name, who sent I, in front of the coffee machine located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu; and (b) purchased approximately 0.2g of philophones concealed in a nearby public telephone room, which I notified.

6. On July 2012, after the date specified in the above paragraph (5) attached, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of the phiphonephones purchased at the Defendant’s house located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J, with the same as the above paragraph (5), into beer, and administered them by dilution with a single medication of approximately 0.1g of the phiphonephones purchased at the Defendant’s house.

7. On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of the philophones purchased at the home of the Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph 5, once, into beer, with dilution, and then was dilution with the beer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Requests for appraisal, reports on the results of appraisal, and notification on the results of appraisal;

1. The Acts and subordinate statutes shall contain telephone details, investigation reports and telephone calls;