beta
Text
1. Each 1/5 share of the real estate listed in the separate sheet is owned by each Plaintiff (Appointed Party), Appointed B, C, D, and E.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is currently unregistered, and each land divided from the FF 302 square meters prior to Jinju-si (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”).
B. According to the former land cadastre, the land of this case was assessed against G on October 16, 1913, and its ownership was transferred to H on April 23, 1935.
C. Some of the maternity land of the instant case was divided into 126 and 10 minutes before the J on November 13, 1936.
Since then, on November 13, 1936, the land category of the above I was changed to that of the road, and 417 square meters at Jinju-si.
(Attachment List 1; hereinafter “I land”); and 10 square meters before the said J was transferred to K on November 14, 1938; after the land category was changed to a road on July 15, 1953, part of the land was divided on February 13, 1986 and became 15 square meters at J-si.
(Attachment List 2; hereinafter referred to as “J land”; hereinafter referred to as “J land”; hereinafter referred to as “the instant land”); The family heir’s children and children (the deceased on April 7, 1938) net M (the deceased on May 8, 193) net N (the deceased on August 6, 1987) B(1/5)O (the deceased on August 29, 1950), P (the deceased on November 6, 197 and no heir) designated parties C(1/5) (1/5) and Q (1/5) who were designated parties (1/5) (1/5) and Q (the deceased on May 10, 1994).
D. The plaintiffs (designated parties, hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiffs") and the designated parties are the successors of the network L, and the successors and the inheritance shares of the network L are as listed below.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 4 through 7, and the purport of whole pleading
2. Determination
A. In full view of the aforementioned facts and evidence, the following circumstances, namely, L, the grouped of the Plaintiff and the designated parties, and H’s Chinese name, the owner of the mother land of this case and the I land (H), were M at the time of the death of April 7, 1938, Australia’s heir (the son) was divided from the mother land of this case.