The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

Defendant.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment of a fine of KRW 30 million is too unreasonable.

2. The acts of arranging sexual traffic do not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to cut off and severe punishment against the business owners who run illegal sexual traffic business establishments. The defendant leased five officetels in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, and then, the defendant is disadvantageous to the defendant for the following reasons: employing many female sexual traffic, arranging sexual traffic, arranging sexual traffic, and arranging sexual traffic systematically and closely through the site of arranging sexual traffic, etc. by soliciting customers.

However, considering all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s confession and reflect on all of the crimes of this case, the period of the crime of this case, the size of gains acquired by the crime of this case, and other Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is reasonable, the part of the judgment of the court below against the defendant under Article 346 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act is reversed, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

Punishment of the crime

D When a commercial sex acts business place located in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Etel A, which was operated by D, was controlled by the police around September 24, 2012, the Defendant received the said business establishment from D and received from D around October 2012, and from November 2012, the Defendant continued to operate the said business as the trade name “F,” “F, while operating the said Etel Atel A, 906, 1404, 1904, 1906, 1906, 1906, and 1906,” and received money from customers to report the commercial sex acts site on condition that 1.5 million won per month.