logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고단6246
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant involved in the fraud of the mobile phone usage fee, in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, would lend the mobile phone name to the victim D by using only 15 days on the face of the 15th day of the lending of the mobile phone name.

It is not necessary to see whether or not to pay the charges that have occurred during that period.

“A false representation was made.”

However, since the defendant is a bad credit holder, he did not have the intention or ability to change the name of the victim after 15 days, and there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone usage fee imposed on the victim due to the absence of any specific property, such as having been liable for the debt of about 40 million won.

On December 14, 2015, the Defendant had the victim open 6S (G) 1 unit in the E-F located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 6 G) unit in the Soviet ju City of gallon, respectively. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant had the victim use 2 unit in the above mobile phone, with the method of not paying user fees from May 2016 to pay user fees, and 5,79,520 won in the total amount of 5,79,520 won in property benefits.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 11, 2016, the Defendant was willing to subscribe to TV broadcast service by stealing the name of D with a view to arranging mobile phones that were delivered by D, as set forth in paragraph (1) of the said Article, on the pretext of forging a private document related to the use of TV broadcast service.

On July 11, 2016, the Defendant, at Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, the Defendant’s residence, applied for TV broadcast service (HDCO) in the name of D by posting a telephone at the customer center (T-BroD) (T-817-8577). On July 12, 2016, the following day, the Defendant visited the Defendant’s residence on July 12, 2016, for the “T-Brod Service Use Contract” in the column for each applicant.

arrow