logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.03.28 2013고단74
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 5 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant C’s fine of 5,00,000.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is each internal director of Company G and H, Inc.

Defendant

A The following year from February 28, 2012 to the point of view that “A would apply for a television set-term product, Internet ADSL, and general telephone service at the address of the victim” was installed at the victim’s address and did not pay a total of KRW 175,561,00,000,000 for the service charges, and received only the merchandise coupon issued at the time of applying for the service, such as the Internet, from the communication company to the Internet, and exchanged it in cash.” However, the victim’s phone calls that “ASL would apply for a television set-term product, Internet ADSL, and general telephone service at the address of the victim,” and that it did not pay a total of KRW 120,000,000,000 for the service charges.

5. By the end of 14.1, the Internet service, etc. was installed as shown in the separate sheet of crime (1), but the total amount of 4,293,264 won was not paid, and a total of 6,343,264 won was acquired through a total of 56 times by delivery of only KRW 2,50,000 in total of merchandise coupons.

2. Defendants B and C are inside directors of JJ Co., Ltd.

On October 31, 2011, the Defendants conspired with Defendant C’s office located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the facts are that even if they applied for the Internet, etc. in the above company’s name, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the service charges. Moreover, even if they were to receive only merchandise coupons issued at the time of applying for service, such as the Internet, from the above communications company, and exchange them in cash and divide them into half in cash, the Defendants’ false statement that “I would apply for the Internet ADSL service in Eunpyeong-gu L” in the victim K, which is called “I would apply for the said service by telephone, TV set-term, and Internet ADSL service.” The Defendants did not pay the total service charges of KRW 35,974,00,000,000.

arrow