(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.28 2014고정1996

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.28 2014고정1996

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on April 25, 2014, the Defendant was punished in the office of the Ministry of Employment and Labor in the third floor of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-ro 320 Thai Building, and as a matter of the calculation method of annual allowances with the victim C (n, 40 years of age) who is an employee of the retired company and the Defendant’s employees in charge of employment of the retired company.

The victim abuseds the left hand of the victim and assaulted against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (a statement to the effect that the fact that the victim's grandchildren is even satisfed at the date and time of the board);

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A statement recorded on the third trial date by a witness D;

1. A photograph of bals of assault [the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant does not have any bals of the victim by taking the bals of the victim, but considering the above evidence, this part of the facts charged is fully convicted of this part of the facts charged]

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is that the defendant assaulted the victim once with the victim's left knife at the time and place stated in the facts charged in the judgment.

2. As evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, the victim's statement and the investigative agency are made.

However, in light of the fact that the victim stated in this court that the defendant tried to take away the paper in which the calculation method of the annual allowance is written from the victim, and that the labor inspector D at the present site of this case appears to have taken the victim's hand, but did not regard the victim's breath due to his hand, the victim's statement at the investigative agency alone has the victim's intentional act of assault.

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2017.09.29 2017노1631

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2013.10.30 2013고정187

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.14 2013고정714

-대전지방법원 2016.06.30 2015고정1781

-대전지방법원 2014.10.23 2014고정702